|
Presentation of artwork is no less important than creation of artwork
itself. This may sound controversial, but is true to a large extent:
you may get a chance to have unmistakable proof when you see one of your
own works on display in an exhibition, framed and lighted, against the
broad wall ¡ it will seem quite different from how it
looked back at home.
Unfortunately, the easiness of exhibiting pictures on the Internet also
means the equal easiness to abuse it, and a great lot of the artwork
seen online is simply badly presented. Laying aside the cases when the
images are displayed unaligned, uncropped, with spiral binders visible,
and even the outrageous case of landscape-oriented pictures
whose creators apparently expect the viewers to tilt their heads 90 degrees
to the side because they neglected to rotate the images after
scanning, one major vice remains which plagues the whole
range of artists from wannabes right to many skilled ones. Its posting
the raw scans.
This is so frequently seen that its not even a problem
anymore its a real pestilence. It is most
evident on the scans of sketches and pencil drawings, which are of much
lower contrast than, to say, ink works. A fine example of that is our
illustration (courtesy of Paul Mason; thank you Paul).
Gray lines on gray background, accompanied by creased paper, finger blots
et cetera. (I have even seen scans that were practically black: their brightest
value was no brighter than 30% gray.)
Of course, its a pity, because its only the matter of
seconds to clean the scan up and make it look
presentable if only the artist knew a tiny
trick. Which I am going to show right now.
Scanners, naturally, are imperfect tools, even though many of them come
with foolproof software which automatically adjusts them to the
originals brightness and contrast. Yet, the stuff that even the
better scanners transfer to the computer is not the best we can get
from the image: it always needs cleaning up. The primary problem of
all scanners is the value range error.
Ideally, the value (brightness) in the image should vary from the maximum
(100%) at the whitest point to the minimum (0%) at the blackest point. In
scanner output, however, it is practically never so, especially with low
contrast originals (i.e. graphite on paper). You are more likely to get
something like 83% at the whitest point and 12% at the blackest point, which
means youve lost almost one third of the brightness range, and both
your white and your black are really rather gray.
The primary task in cleaning the scan and making it presentable is driving the
black and white to their places. Fortunately, Adobe Photoshop™
contains a tool designed precisely for this task (*).
Enter Levels command.
(*) Paint Shop Pro also has a similar tool, as well as
many scanning utilities, but I wouldnt advise using the latter.
Continue... |